Google, once a defender of net neutrality and a company whose informal motto was “don’t be evil,” may soon reach an agreement with Verizon, which will severely compromise the free flow of information that has made the Internet such a powerful force for creativity, collaboration, and learning.
WASHINGTON — Google and Verizon, two leading players in Internet service and content, are nearing an agreement that could allow Verizon to speed some online content to Internet users more quickly if the content’s creators are willing to pay for the privilege. via Google and Verizon near deal on pay tiers for web
Essentially this means large corporations and governments will have access to the high-speed lanes; their content will be seen first and fastest. The Internet will become a reserved lane system with the on-ramps blocked for those who can’t pay. A system built with public funds will increasingly become a means to fill the pockets of the few at the expense of the public.
Let’s push that metaphor a bit more: Internet corporations are legally responsible to their shareholders and not to the public. We will soon see them devoting virtually all of their resources to improving only the high-speed lanes leaving potholes for the rest of us.
Save the Internet and others are pushing Google and Verizon to be more socially responsible, but that’s at best a short-term fix. Net neutrality, including our access to information, requires legislative and judicial protection. Otherwise, we’re facing a serious compromise of the First Amendment.
Silver, Josh (2010, August 5). Google-Verizon deal: The end of the Internet as we know it. Huffington Post.
Tady, Megan (2010, August 5). Google turns its back on net neutrality. Save the Internet.
Wyatt, Edward (2010, August 4). Google and Verizon near deal on pay tiers for web. New York TImes.
Pingback: On network neutrality « Chip’s journey
Pingback: Network neutrality notes « Chip’s journey
Pingback: Loosing My Voice « Martin Wolske's Weblog
The Google-Verizon deal is new, as far as I know, but the concerns about net neutrality have been around for a while. Two decades ago there was concern about the effects of privatization of NSFNET, that some private companies would gain at the public expense, or that open access would be endangered when profit goals superseded general goals of open communication.
Is this real? I noticed that the FB page for SaveTheInternet says founded in 2005………. if this is new, how were they concerned about it five years ago?